khuffiness when responding to the factor. these. the spin stops right here and we are always looking out for you. >> this is a fox news alert tonight. there is conflicting information coming from inside the obama administration about what the federal government new about one of the boston bombing sis's overseas travels. first an update on his younger broth who are continues to recover from a variety of injuries inside a heavily-guarded massachusetts hospital room. today the u.s. attorney handle the case announced that doctors's have upgraded his condition but there's no word whether or not he can communicate with authorities. now back to the other breaking news story of the day and that's whether or not the obama

administration is already changing its story about the contact with the older of duty suspects. on the one hand the fbi is claiming they had no knowledge of this man's trip to russia back in 2012, however, that's been now directly contradicted by homeland security secretary sherlock january -- janet. >> that was the administration's

official position yesterday. now fast forward that. narrative has dramatically changed. now here is sherlock janet napolitano from earlier today. >> was your department aware of his travels to russia? and if you weren't, the reason? >> the travel in 2012 that you are referring to? >> yeah. >> yes. the system pinged when he was leaving the united states. by the time he returned, all investigations had been -- the matter had been closed. >> now, first the fbi claims that a minor spelling error was enough to prevent the federal government from tracking this potential terrorist's travels, now the dhs, they admit that they knew full well this would-be bomber left the country for an extended period of time. they just never both toad follow up on whether or not he returned to the u.s. it did not sit well with a number of lawmakers on capitol

hill, including senator graham. >> i was told in march they got a letter of the russian services that the oldest broth wares a radical islamist, watch out for him. they claim the system did not pick him going to russia in 2012 because the name was misspelled now. i hear from the homeland security secretary that we did know he left the country, we just didn't know he came back. this makes no sense to me. how in the world could we have missed all of this? >> now earlier this week senator marco rubio of florida also expressed potential flaws in our nation's border control policy and he added those flaws needed to be addressed as immigration reform continues in washington. joining me now is marco rubio. senator, welcome back to the program. good to see you. >> thank you for having me back. >> they give us one story 24 hours ago, now they contradict themselves. >> right. >> this guy, it was pointed out as a potential radical

extremist. i'm concerned we are back to pen ghazi and blaming a youtube video here, senator. where have i seen this before? >> first of all i think the fbi continues to learn about what happened and didn't happen. but after they checked him out they said they didn't find anything and they closed the case. then he comes back in the country and they were aware of that but nobody followed up because the case had been closed. that's problematic. we have an emerging problem that he knew would be a problem and that is people living in the united states, maybe citizens, who are being radicalized by things they are hearing or reading and learning how to make bombs on the internet, et cetera. this is the growing face of the terrorists facing our country. it's a very serious threat and we need tosspot stop playing political correctness and identify it for what it is. it is terrorism. just because he wasn't organized in a cave somewhere in the middle east, this is terrorism.

this is terrorism and we need to deal with it that way. >> there was one article that said we had an increase since 9/11," 2001. and about 500% of saudi student visas, people coming into this country. culturally if you come from a country like saudi arabia where women are covered, they cannot go out in public without a male they are related to and they have the morality police, when there's such a cultural difference, do we need to consider that when we are thinking about allowing people into this country, when we have the choice of who we can let in? >> let me say this about that, there are flaws that are exposed by this incident and we need to point them out and correct them. we do not admit people or we are very reticent to admit people from other countries on visitors visas if it's a country where people tend to overstays. some don't have the overstay problem and it's easier for them

to come. we take that into account. why wouldn't we do that when it comes to national security? he is essence, we should be able to analyze these are individuals coming from a part of the world that keeps feeding into the terrorist network, we should be concerned about that. i don't want to john lies everybody, but there is no right to come into the united states. it's something we allow people to do. there's no right to come here from abroad and study. we should be very careful about who we allow in and take into account every single measure or every single factor that we think could lead to somebody being more likely a member of a terrorist organization or causing terror. >> a lot of conservatives have had skepticism over the immigration bill and that was prior to the attacks in boston. some said there were secret e-mails between you, and grover nor crist and kato over the issue and you change your position. i want to give you a chance to respond. >> first of all, i don't know

about anything about secret e-mails. i don't secret e-mail anyone so i don't know what that refers to. i think what they are talking about is asking for talking points on some things but nose secret e-mails. i will say this, i think people have a good reason to be skeptical about immigration reform because this administration has not done a good job of enforcing the law. one of the biggest obstacles we face is the administration's lack of enforcing the law. but if we don't do anything, that's what what leaving in pla. the only way i know to make this administration or a future administration to secure the border is to pass a law that force them to secure the boarder and that's what i'm working on t requires them to spend up toward of $5.5 billion to get a fencing plan and get an entrance and

exit tracking system. that's better than what we have in place right now. if we can't get those things done, what stays in place is what we have now and how is that good for us? >> why don't we start at the beginning and walk through what a registered provision immigrant is. if this bill passes, what happens on day one? then we have a series of triggers before somebody could even apply for a green card. >> that's right. >> explain what the triggers are so that we don't have a third wave of illegal immigrants, another, quote, amnesty debate discussion in the country. >> that's exactly right. i don't want people to point to this ten years from now and say what a mistake that was, i want to get it done right. that's why i'm willing to listen to anyone. and you have to be here by a date certain in the past, december, 2011. nothing happens on day one. nothing. there's a six-month period in which the department of homeland security must create both a border security plan and a

border fencing plan and we allocate money for both plans. once the plans are in place and they have gun to implement the lance, then once people who are illegal here, and they have been here three years, they have to come forward and go a security check, a background check, pay a fine, an makes fee, and then they get a professional status that allows them to work in the united states and pay taxes. they don't qualify for any federal benefits. and they will have to be in that status for ten years until the border security plans are in place. and entry-exit tracking system is in place >> we have a lot more ground. we will bring you back and talk about it when we have missouri time but we appreciate you being with us. >> thank you, sean. >> coming up next. >> would you as an expert be thinking domestic at this point? the islamic world, certainly not to al-qaeda in terms of their world, it doesn't have any iconic significance. >> tonight a hannity in-depth

investigation into the mainstream media's pathetic attempt to blame conservatives for the bombing attack. and then later. >> what about the opinion about jihad? >> the phrase of jihad has a lot of meanings within islam. and it's subject to a lot of different interpretations. >> really? you will hear what president obama really things about jihad, radical islam and the war on terror. you do not want to miss this tape. tell your friends to watch as hannity continues. you brought the flex in... as soon as i met fiona and i was describing the problem we were having with our rear brakes, she immediately triaged the situation, knew exactly what was wrong with it, the car was diagnosed properly, it was fixed correctly i have confidence knowing that if i take to ford it's going to be done correctly with the right parts and the right people. get a free brake inspection and brake pads installed for just 49.95 after rebates when you use the ford service credit card. did you tell him to say all of that? no, he's right though...

if you've got it, you know how hard it can be to breathe and man, you know how that feels. copd includes emphysema and chronic bronchitis. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled copd maintenance treatment that helps open my obstructed airways for a full 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder does not replace fast-acting inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems,

glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva. discuss all medicines you take, even eye drops. stop taking spiriva and seek immediate medical help if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells, you get hives, vision changes or eye pain, or problems passing urine. other side effects include dry mouth and constipation. nothing can reverse copd. spiriva helps me breathe better. does breathing with copd weigh you down? don't wait to ask your doctor about spiriva. to your table for a limited time! it's our seafood dinner for two for just 25 dollars! a handcrafted seafood feast made to share. first you each get salad and unlimited cheddar bay biscuits. then choose two from a wide variety of chef-inspired trées like our new honey garlic crispy shrimp or new seafood lover's lingui. round out your seafood dinner with your choice of either an appetizer or dessert to share! don't miss our seafood dinner for two, just $25 at red lobster, where we sea food different.

>> immediately after the terrorist attack in boston last week before there was even the smallest bit of evidence about who was responsible for the bombings, liberal lawmakers and their left wing cohorts in the mainstream media, they tried to blame the violence on conservatives, with some saying it had some connection to tax day. here's a few examples of the disgusting, grotesque reporting. watch. >> michael stated that. that came up. all the econnic events being told about today, i knew it was tax day because i got it in. but it's patriots days and also the boston marathon. would you as an expert be thinking domestic at this point? >> the islamic world and certainly not to al-qaeda in terms of their world, it doesn't have any iconic significance. >> i'm sure what was going through the president's mind is we don't know who was doing it. was it tax day?

you just don't know. so i think his attitude is lets not put any inference into it, let's make clear we will get the people responsible. >> anything you say could prejudge. >> and have reverberations all over the world. >> for those who hate america and new its history, monday had significant meaning. in hawaii monday was a holiday, patriots day's commemorating the first shots fired in the revolution. >> the real patriots day is april 19th. that's the day that counts for people on the extreme right in the united states. as it happens, massachusetts celebrates patriots day on the third monday of the month. >> but about international terrorists, there is this fact. april has seen it's share of random violence, aimed at the innocent and vulnerable in public places. >> all right. were there any public apologize,

any corrections issued? of course not. joining me now with reaction is the director of the next generation dot tv, and juan williams. thanks for being with us. >> you're welcome. >> juan, within 24 hours barney frank is out there saying, using this -- this is why we need big government, liberal government. mr. oyer within 24 hours using it to make a cheap political point about sequestration. at what point beyond the speculation, there was a desire or a hope, juan, that this was a right wing connected terror attack. why is that? why is there always that knee jerk side on the left? >> normally i would say to you, you know, some exceptions to the rule but i see a pattern here too. i think back to colorado, james and the initial report there that he was somehow some kind of right wing are he and i think back to what happened down in arizona in the gabby gifford

case linking gerald with the tea party. >> what did bill clinton do? he blamed rush limbaugh. >> i think you are on to something, but remember the media just performs horribly last week. they had people, you know, higher number of casualties, they had a dark skin suspect, i could go on to the number. it was just out of think media r a story that they forgot how to do basic reporting. >> well, juan, i was hoping to have a big fight with you, but i don't know if it's going to happen. >> what are you going to do? sometimes we agree. >> colonel west, it was actually grotesque and juan was right, the reporting, the rush to judgment, it was beyond speculation. it was almost outright hope that it was a conservative that they could pin this on. why do you think that is?

>> well, you forgot to mention the article that was written over at salon magazine where he outright said i hope the boston bomber is a white american. i believe that for whatever reason there's an ideological agenda that will fit the narrative very well. if it ends up being someone, quote, unquote, a right wing extremist or conservative. instead of when you have these individuals like major hasn, carlos bledso and malaki and the shoe bomber, then you have to deal with this sense of you have to get away from political relativism. you have to get away from political correctness and you have to be able to define the enemy. one thing i think we should all do, and especially people in the administration, read the book "the art of war." because if we ten to not admit that there is in enemy, the

islamic totalitarianism or islam, whatever you call it, you would never be able to effective combat it. >> as far as i'm concern, this is the rise, we will look back through history, and this is the rise of the radical islamist. let me go to two examples. cnn and nbc were the worst. let me give you two examples of nbc. roll this tape. >> i keep wondering, is it possible that there would ever be a discussion that this is because of ben affleck and the connection between boston and movies about violence. and of course the answer is no! no one will ever think this is about those things. but at the same time there's something, i appreciate the way that you claim it is the one drop. because given the cheffian, given they are caucasian, our very sense of connection to them is this framed-up notion like islam making them into something. >> let me ask you about domestic terrorism as a category.

normally domestic terrorist people tend to be on the far right although that's not a good category. extremists, let's calm them that. do they advertise if they do something like this? do they try to get credit as a group or do they hate america so much they just want to do the damage and don't car if they get public credit, if you will? >> we will play later in the show, the president was asked a question about jihad. his answer is pathetic. he wouldn't use the term war on terror. why can't the left acknowledge the rise of radical islamic jihadist that would van bombs on their own children in the name of allah and in the hope of 72 versions. why can't we acknowledge that this is pretty darn widespread and a real danger to peace-loving americans of all religions, including islam? >> in fact, you know what we learned today from that fbi interview of the suspect in the hospital room, is that he said that they were radicalized, the

older brother in specific, they were upset about afghanistan. >> why can't the president say it? why can't he say what is obvious. >> i am going to tell you something. going back i think he was responding to the idea that somehow the war on terror had become a war on islam and he was trying to tone it down. he came out with this manmade event. >> there is a distinction. but their numbers are growing and we are giving f-16s to the muslim brotherhood. >> you are absolutely right. one of the things is you have to be called to action. there was an egyptian cleric that was recently on egyptian tv that talked about the day after the boston bombing, and the only thing he said was that it was amateurish. but yet america deserved it and furthermore he talked about france will get the exact same thing. what did we see earlier today? we saw a terrorist bombing of the friend of embassy in libya.

we have to confront the enemy and come up with solutions to protect american people outside of this country and domestically. >> appreciate it. take care. coming up, did the federal government's reckless decision to mirandize dzhokhar take the death penalty off the table? those fears are growing. >> and then later. >> the phrase jihad has a lot of meanings within islam. >> you will hear the pathetic answer from the president, his own words and whether or not his administration recognizes that we are actually fighting a war on terrorism against radical islamic jihaddists. we will debate it coming up. ls led by the powerful sportsman 850 ho. value-minded side-by-sides featuring the new ranger 800 midsize. and full-size workhorses including the all-new, class-leading, 60-horsepower, ranger xp 900.

polaris. hardest working, smoothest riding. huge rebates and low financing are available right now during the polaris xp sales event. ♪ now roundup has a new sharp-shootin' wand ♪ ♪ just point and shoot, and weeds are gone ♪ ♪ 'round fences, trees, even mulched beds ♪ ♪ 'cause the only good weed is a weed that's dead ♪ ♪ roundup [ male announcer ] with a new one-touch wand. yeha! [ whip cracks ] [thto fight chronic. with osteoarthritis pain.. to fight chronic low back pain. to take action. to take the next step. today, y will know you did something for your pain. cymbalta can help. cymbalta is a pain reliever fda-approved to manage chronic musculoskeletal pain. one non-narcotic pill a day, every day, can helpeduce this pain. tell your doctor right away if your mood worsens, you have unusual changes in mood or behavior or thoughts of suicide. anti-depressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. cymbalta inot for children under 18.

people taking maois, linezolid or thioridazine or with uncontrolled glaucoma should not take cymbalta. taking it with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners may increase bleeding risk. severe liver problems, some fatal, were reported. signs include abdominal pain and yellowing skin or eyes. tell your doctor about all your medicines, including those for migraine and while on cymbalta, call right away if you have high fever, confusion and stiff muscles or serious allergic skin reactions like blisters, peeling rash, hives, or mouth sores to address possible life-threatening conditions. talk about your alcohol use, lir disease and before you reduce or stop cymbalta. dizziness or fainting may occur upon standing. take the next step. talk to your doctor. cymbalta can help. man: how did i get here? dumb luck? or good decisions? ones i've made. ones we've all made. about marriage. children. money. about tomorrow. here's to good decisions. who matters most to you says the most about you.

at massmutual we're owned by our policyowners, and they matter most to us. ready to plan for your family's future? we'll help you get there.

>> now as dzhokhar lays in his

hospital bed recovering from gunshot wounds and as investigators continue to swear gate him, a judge gave him his miranda right and now lawmakers fear this legal action unknowingly took the death center off the table. listen to what senators had to say on the senate floor earlier today. >> how do you get the death penalty when the only way you can get information out of the suspect is to go through his lawyer? you can't have this national security interrogation where there's no lawyer to get information to protect against a future tact tick that can't be used in the trial. don't you think the lawyer is going to say i'm not going to have my client talk to you unless you promise not to seek the death penalty? >> i would say that the senator from south carolina, i don't know how that was 'nibble this case. any defense lawyer, as they should to defend their client, there's no way they oill allow that individual who committed the terrorist attack in boston to speak to one investigator now if we get additional information, we have follow-up

questions, without taking the death penalty off the table. >> so did they rush to mirandize the suspect? did it give him the upper hand and did it open the door for the terrorist to negotiate with the u.s. government in here to answer that former l.a. pd detective, mark furman and mr. anderson jr. seems to me the case is a slam-dunk. we have the video, we know where he dropped the backpack, we know where the explosion occurred. so the question i have, the more important matter for me is financing, are there foreign ties, is this part of a broader plot of terror that we need to know about. that's why it was a mistake to do this. your thoughts? >> absolutely. we want to know all the contacts both these brothers had and any of their family pause sometimes family members are used to actually transport money or receive money and any other kind of materials that might be used for their cause. but, sean, you look at this, you

anywhere an advertise the suspect, you give him an attorney. the only bargaining chip you have to get this information that you are seeking or that we all want is the death penalty. so just imagine this, the way you are supposed to do it, the proper method is you tell -- you tell the suspect, okay, there's a possibility of a deal here u need to give us the information, we need to verify it. it has to be high quality information that is really of value to us and then we will bring in and ask the u.s. attorney to cut a deal. short of that, you are getting the death penalty. >> you have the right to remain silent. peter johnson jr.. >> i don't think it makes sense. there's an opportunity to make a deal at anytime. nothing has been lost. public safety exception went into effect. he was interrogate ford intelligence and national security purposes. now he's going before an american court with american rules and american laws.

i say the constitution has to stand. i say that terror should not divide us, nor shoes terror teardown our laws and our constitution. you can't have it halfway. can't have half a constitution and say, okay we will treat him as an enemy comebattent but then we will try him later. we can change the laws or the constitution, but for convenience second let's to the drag our constitution into the toilet. president obama lincoln as president i have no eyes but constitutional eyes. that's the prism we should be viewing the case, a loathe some and disgusting and as horrible a citizen he is, he's still an american citizen. and even senator graham says he cannot be tried in a military commission. law needs to be changed if that's what we want to do. >> what do you think, mark? >> well, when you look at this whole situation, first the

internet has shrunk the world to the point that your radicalization from communicating online, watching movies, interchanging through images that go back and forth 10,000 miles, you are in the same situation as if you were in a cave in the middle of afghanistan. so i don't buy the motion that just because you are geographically in the united states you are not part of that army. they are, in fact, part of that army. >> but, mark, let's talk about the law. you can talk politically and retorecally -- >> i don't want to talk about the law. >> but a suspect needs to be a member of al-qaeda or taliban. >> okay. >> what i am saying here very clearly, mark, is you are not a veteran. you fought for our rights and constitution in this country. i don't think that the act of these band of brothers, despicable americans, at least one of them, should create an opportunity for us to destroy our constitution.

so if you want to change the law, i might be with you. if you want to change the constitution, i might be with you. but we have a framework of laws that we have to abide by. and it can't be a little of this, or a little of that based on convenience. >> all right. let's get mark his quick answer here. >> okay, quick answer. the only problem here is the world is watching. i don't know how many attorneys, fbi officials are watching this interrogation, it's so soft it's like it's in grade school. the problem is how do we know he's telling the truth? he's going to take the easiest route to please us. >> have we become a hysterical nation who is willing to bend to our principles? that's what the world is watching. >> one question i have, is he at war with us, is he a criminal or is he a terrorist that's at war with the united states? we don't know yet. >> we is probably all but he's part of our criminal justice system now and we should hold

him accountable and execute him. >> mark, good to see you. peter good to see you. thank you. >> coming up next. what is your been about jihad? >> the phrase jihad has a lot of meanings within islam. it's subject to a lot of different interpretations. >> all right. the president's pathetic answer. when we get back to that question about jihad, and we will be asking some very important questions about the threat from radical islam and the war on terror. by the way we always want to hear from you on the hannity show. just log on to our special companion site. as always, share your thoughts on this and much more. just go to hannitylive [ female announcer ] crest plus scope celebrates the daring ones.

for him, who dares to get in the picture. for her, who dares to show her love to the world. for the daring ones, there's crest plus scope. the only toothpaste that combines the freshness of scope with the whitening power of crest.

>> in the wake of the boston terror attack will president obama finally be able to stand up and admit a war against

radical islam is happening? he and his administration has said to the past that seems unlikely. back in 2010 was he asked by a student in mumbai what he thought about jihad and rather than tackle the issue head on with a clear answer, he instead chose to ramble on speaking in broad generalities. here's the clip. piece in mind we piece it had together with a number of different camera angles. however, the president's words were not edited and the official transcript of his answer is available on the white house's official website. >> what is your opinion or take about jihad? >> the phrase of jihad has a lot of meanings within islam. and it's subject to a lot of different interpretations. but i will say that, first, islam is one of the world's great religions. and more than a billion people

who practice islam, the overwhelming majority view their obligations to their religion as one that reaffirm peace and justice and fairness and tolerance. i think all of us recognize that this great religion, in the hands of a few extremists, has been distorted to justify violence toward innocent people that is never justified. >> that clip pretty much says it all. reality is we face a very real threat from radical islamists, and this administration is either just too naive or too political correct to say it, to acknowledge it and to realize it. it's a dangerous >> frankly, pre9/11 mind-set. joining me is the co-host of the five, dana perino: she asked

about jihad. first of all, there are not really many interpretations. that's spin. jihad equals holy war, number one. he didn't answer the question by then going out of his way to talk about muslims that are not radical jihaddists. why did he do that? >> reality is that the president denies that we are in a war on terror. that policy stance, that outreach to muslims, has basically failed. we are under organized attack from overseas and it is islamic attack on america. at home he pursues a policy of extraordinary political correctness. that is opening the door to terror at home. >> he wouldn't even acknowledge the term war on terror. man-caused disaster, overseas contingency operations. fort hood was not workplace violence, it was a terror attack. >> we should get the information out of the terrorist who is currently in the hospital in

boston because we will not define him as an enemy combatant. i don't care if he's convicted, i want the information from the guy. that's what it's all about. >> he will be convicted. we don't need to worry about that. this president, why won't he acknowledge what is the truth? tell the american people the truth. george bush did. >> i am not usually in a position of speaking for or defending president obama, but i'm going to in this case. >> oh, boy. we will have a fight here >> we might have a big fight. i was very comfortable with global war on terror. that language was very clear to me. i knew what the president meant when he said you are either with us or against us. when he had the bush doctrine about fighting terror and if you were a state spoken or of tar or, then you are also guilty of terror and we are going to root you out. i understand from obama's point of view, president obama was george w. bush was too hot on that shall other so he sought to cool down the rhetoric. what president obama is saying

in front of all those students, who are muslim, he's trying to paint a picture that american believes in freedom of religion, which we do, that we don't think everybody that practices islam is radical. >> nobody is saying that. >> that's what he is trying to do. president obama after 9/11, remember he went to the mosque. the reason he went to the mosque is talk about religion tolerance. >> was fort hood a terrorist attack? >> i think it was, yes. >> he lied to us, number one. and this president has a problem with acknowledging this truth. is it true that radical islamic jihadist want a world-wide calafate, and as the 9/11 commission said they are at war with us. >> i think he agrees with you and i think he takes his responsibility to protect america. >> who? >> president obama. i think he agrees with the statement. >> i don't think he has the courage to say it. >> maybe he wouldn't say it in public, but he would agree with you.

>> had this worked. >> i think the alternative is to say, what he could have said to the students is, what we will not tolerate is anyone who uses violence against invent people to achieve political goals. >> but he didn't say it. >> but i'm saying he could have said that. >> contrast this to when he went to cairo, and, i will end torture. we didn't use torture. we waterboarded three people who, by the way, gave us the intelligence to get bin laden. he's willing to take on america and call america, quote, in his view mistakes, i disagree for what it is, but he can't identify terrorism for what it is, which tells me i think these radical jihadist view him as weak, as a classic appeaser in that sense. >> his approach is appeasement. his approach is soft. that invites the criticism that you are weak and that opens up the door to our enemies who wish to attack us. >> dana is mad at us.

>> if that were true, then we would have had many more of the attacks. fbi has a lot to answer for, and if i were president obama i would be calling in the director and saying, you are 0 for 5 on these things. we were lucky the first four times. the terrorists were able to get -- >> i think passing the words, enough of legal us lick rangling. >> but he's never going to do that. >> join the battle and admit the battle and win. >> he bangs his foot on the floor as if it is to the music. >> that's inside information. i'm glad you are playing ftse underneath the table while you are arguing. >> why do you always do this to me? >> the obama administration is deliberately -- we will expose the president's latest sequestration stunt. coming up austin goulsby will be here to defend his former boss.

you load your freight, with its foot-activated lift gate. but that's not all you'll see, cause c-max also beats prius v, with better mpg. say hi to the 47 combined mpg c-max hybrid. and you see the woman you fell in love with. she's everything to you. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis.

side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial. we can afford to take an extra trip this year. first boston... then san francisco. hotwire checks the competitions' rates every day so they can guarantee their low prices. so our hotels were half price. ♪ h-o-t-w-i-r-e... ♪ hotwire.com

>> yesterday flight delays mounted after thousands of airlines were delayed due to sequestrations. many were mount two hours behind schedule and there seems to be no relief in site because feddal aviation officials are saying they have no choice. some lawmakers are not buying that explanation and tries it a stunt orchestrated by the obama administration. listen to what pat toomy had to say. >> the furloughs among air-traffic controllers, the shutting down of air traffic towers is entirely utterly unnecessary. this is a wilful choice being made by this administration in order to inflict as disruptive a

process as possible on the american public and on our economy, all to further a political agenda. and the political agenda is to try to convince the american people that there are no circumstances under which we can ever cut spending at all. >> couldn't have said it better myself. here's with react, former vises sore, professor of the booth chicago school of business, with the man who caused these economic problems himself, austin goolsbee >> i got stuck on the on the aie this weekend. >> my bleeding liberal heart. i feel bad for you. i have a series of questions to have you. i know you are a smart guy and a profession professor and teacher. we just have disagreements on the economy. who first suggested the sequestration? >> who first advocated it or suggested it? >> who pushed forward the idea for sequestration? >> to get -- >> it's not a hard question. >> the administration.

>> barack obama did so he proposed the sequestration. next question, who offered president obama the flexibility and where to prioritize the cut? >> you know that's misleading. the administration was for total flexibility but it wasn't that, it was a cover -- >> next question. for the year 2013 are we going to spend more money or less money than we did in 2012? >> corrected for -- you mean as a share of the economy? >> are we going to spend more real dollars or less dollars than last year? >> we are back on the same thing. >> why can't you liberals answer simple questions? are we going to spend more money this year than last year? >> you know going to a movies cost a nickel when you were a kid. >> last year -- are we going to spend more money this year or less? did we take in more money or less. >> with the economy, less.

>> we will spend more than last year. >> we cut the deficit in half the fifth year. >> just like shutting down the white house to the little children because obviously little children are not high on the priority list, and just like this, this president to make a cheap political point when we are spending more money, taking in more money, this was his idea, and he doesn't like it, now he's going to make -- he's telling the american people to suffer. >> now i'm confused. now i'm confused. you are the guy who wants to cut the government spending. >> yes, more. >> and anytime they start cutting any government spending you say why is he cutting that spending? >> i'm not saying that at all. i think the president miss prioritized by not having the faa -- he was given the authority by the republicans -- >> you were the guy who was far -- i thought you were the guy who was for unsafe air and unclean water? >> got to get it right. dirty air and dirty water, and kids with autism and down syndrome and the elderly will fend for themselves and we want to kill granny. >> but, but you are for airline

safety, and i appreciate that. >> i am. absolutely. look, austin, here's the problem. we are robbing our kids blind. our kids -- >> if you are for cuts, then stand up and say i'm for cuts. >> yeah, i'm for cutting, absolutely. >> so why are you complaining about -- i should be complaining. i was complaining. i was stuck tonight runway at o'hare because they are cutting this. why are you complaining? >> obama had no problem spending 1830 grand per hour on his jet we pay for so why didn't he lend it to you? >> is your position that if any dollar in the government is wasted, then all government spending should remain because compared to that wasted dollar -- >> i'm saying this was obama's idea. obama pushed it. >> sean, you know that. >> he rejected the public can authority to prioritize the cuts and he cannot do that. >> it w a prioritization.

look -- all right. i want them to do that prioritization, just not the sneaky one they did. >> not the sneaky one they did? >> yes. >> it was prioritization and obama was going to cut the deficit in half his first term. he was going to cut the deficit in half in his first term. >> and it will be in half by the fifth year. we've been through this. it wasn't four years it was five years. >> we got to roll. austin, good to see you. coming up top, a u.n. rights official said u.s. foreign policy is actually to blame for the boston marathon bombing. really? those details next. rancisco. google's backyard for the bing it on challenge. [fight bell: ding, ding] what's your preferred search engine? search engine, uhh, probably google. if we do a side by side blind test comparison, and you end up choosing google, you get an xbox. i'll bet you the xbox, you bet me your son. well let's look up what you need. okay, i would do the left. yeah? what?! i am a daddy! bing wins it! bing won. bing did win.

people prefer bing over google for the web's top searches. don't believe it? go to bingiton.com and see what you're missing.

@ (announcer) at scottrade, our cexactly how they want.t with scottrade's online banking, i get one view of my bank and brokerage accounts with one login... to easily move my money when i need to. plus, when i call my local scottrade office, i can talk to someone who knows how i trade. because i don't trade like everi'm with scottrade. me. (announcer) scottrade. awarded five-stars from smartmoney magazine. [ male announcer ] a car that can actually see like a human, using stereoscopic cameras. ♪ and even stoitself if it h to. ♪ the technology may be hard to imagine. but why you would want it... is not.

the 2014 e-class. it doesn't just see the future. it is the future. [ agent smith ] i've found software that intrigues me. it appears it's an agent of good. ge has wired their medical hardware with innovative software to be in many places at the same time.

using data to connect patients to software, to nurses to the right people and machines. ♪ helping hospitals treat people even better, while dramatically reducing waiting time. now a waiting room is just a room. [ telephone ringing ] [ static warbles ] [ beeping ] red or blue? ♪ >>. >> comments made by a u.n. official richard falk. in his latest column he actually refers to those killed as,

quote, murder victims, and then essentially blames american foreign policy for the deadly attack. he wrote in part, quote: >> that's not all. he suggested the u.s. is evil. he should should we not all be meditating on the haunting line, those to whom evil is done, do evil in return? and while the american jewish committee is denouncing these despicable comment, the government is reward, the body that falk represents with, guess what, billions of your hard-earned tax dollars. the state department plans town crease aid to the u.n. by a whopping $3.6 billion next year alone. if you ask me, that would be money better served in the